GREENEWAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' MEETING MINUTES

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS

The Board of Supervisors' Meeting for the Greeneway Improvement District was called to order on Tuesday, May 21, 2019 at 3:00 p.m. at 6900 Tavistock Lakes Blvd., Suite 200, Orlando, FL 32827. Members listed below constituted a quorum.

Richard Levey Chad Tinetti Amanda Kost

Also attending:

Chair Vice-Chair
Assistant Secretary

Jennifer Walden Lynne Mullins Jeff Newton Larry Kaufmann Troy Davidson Scott Thacker Stephen Flint Tucker Mackie Amanda Lane Norm Ripper

PFM PFM
Donald W. McIntosh Associates Construction Supervisor Construction Committee Construction Committee Tavistock Development Hopping Green & Sams
PFM
HHLC

(via phone)

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS

Dr. Levey announced that there were no public comments at this time.

Public Comment Period

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS		Consideration of Minutes of the April 16, 2019 Board of Supervisors' Meeting

Board Members reviewed the minutes from the April 16, 2019 Board of Supervisors' Meeting.

On Motion by Ms. Kost, second by Mr. Tinetti, with all in favor, the Board of Supervisors for the Greeneway Improvement District approved the minutes of the April 16, 2019 Board of Supervisors' Meeting.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

1

Consideration of Minutes of the May 6, 2019 RFP Meeting to Open Responses for Landscaping and Irrigation Maintenance Services

Board Members reviewed the minutes of the May 6, 2019 RFP Meeting to open responses for Landscaping and Irrigation Maintenance Services.

On Motion by Ms. Kost, second by Mr. Tinetti, with all in favor, the Board of Supervisors for the Greeneway Improvement District approved the minutes of the May 6, 2019 RFP Meeting to Open Responses for Landscaping and Irrigation Maintenance Services.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS		Letter	from	Supervisor	of Elections- Orange County

Ms. Walden stated for the record that there are approximately 2,733 registered voters living in the District.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS		Consideration of Resolution 2019-05, Election of Officers

Ms. Walden noted that the current slate of officers is as follows: Dr. Levey as Chair, Mr. Tinetti as Vice­ Chair, Ms. Walden as Secretary, Ms. Mullins, Dr. Fishkind, Ms. Duerr, and Ms. Kost as Assistant Secretaries, Dr. Fishkind as Treasurer, and Ms. Glasgow as Assistant Treasurer.

Ms. Walden recommended putting Mr. Figuero in place as Assistant Secretary, remove Dr. Fishkind as Assistant Secretary and place Ms. Lane as Treasurer in place of Dr. Fishkind.

On Motion by Mr. Tinetti, second by Ms. Kost, with all in favor, the Board of Supervisors for the Greeneway Improvement District approved Resolution 2019-05, Election of Officers as follows: Dr. Richard Levey as Chair, Mr. Chad Tinetti as Vice-Chair, Ms. Jennifer Walden as Secretary, Ms. Lynne Mullins, Ms. Karen Duerr, Mr. Alex Figuera, and Ms. Amanda Kost as Assistant Secretaries, Ms. Amanda Lane as Treasurer, and Ms. Jennifer Glasgow as Assistant Treasurer.

•
SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of Conveyance of Nemours Parkway Phase 7
Special Warranty Deed
Closing Statement

Ms. Mackie stated that the District has been requested to acquire the right-of-way for Nemours Parkway Phase 7 located within the Greeneway Improvement District at 6.292 acres. Also included is the closing statement for the acquisition with the cash due to the Developer of $471,900.00 for the 6.292 acres at the
$75,000 per acre price.

2

On Motion by Mr. Tinetti, second by Ms. Kost, with all in favor, the Board of Supervisors for the Greeneway Improvement District approved Conveyance of Nemours Parkway Phase 7 in the amount of $471,900.00

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	First Amendment to Temporary Construction and Access Easement Agreement

Ms. Mackie stated the District has an easement in place for drainage associated with Nemours Parkway Phase 7 and this is the amendment for the small drainage area outside of the right of way that will be acquired that is still needed .

On Motion by Mr. Tinetti, second by Ms. Kost, with all in favor, the Board of Supervisors for the Greenaway Improvement District approved First Amendment to Temporary Construction and Access Easement Agreement.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Ms. Walden asked the Board to table this item until the next meeting.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Ms. Walden asked the Board to table this item until the next meeting.

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Consideration	of	District Website Agreement-Tabled

Consideration of ADA Auditing Services Agreement­ Tabled

Consideration of Award of Landscape		and	Irrigation Maintenance			Services Tavistock Lakes and Laureate Boulevard	and	Nemours Parkway
a)  Construction	Committee Recommendation

Mr. Thacker presented the bids to the Board and behind Tab A is the Construction Committees recommendation. As you look at these numbers you will note that Helping Hand Lawn Care received a zero

3

from the Construction Committee and the Committee is recommending that they be deemed non­ responsive. This is based on an incomplete bid, as they did not provided details on how they propose to service the District. As a result, the Construction Committee did not award them any points. For section 1 the Construction Committee ranked Cepra as #1, section 2 Cepra as #1 and section 3 ranked Down to Earth as #1. On the combined evaluation, Down to Earth has the highest ranking based on awarding all three sections as one. The Construction Committee recommended that the Board award sections 1 and 2 to Cepra and section 3 to Down to Earth. There is financial savings by separating the sections out.

Dr. Levey opened the floor for public comment.

Mr. Ripper spoke on behalf of Helping Hand Lawn Care. He stated he felt there were a few things missing from the bid but he thinks they were inconsequential. All the work is bonded and in order to get a bid bond the firm must be approved for the performance bond to do the work. There should be no concern for the issue of HHLC being able to do the work. When the bid was turned in they offered the extra option to go emissions free with the landscape maintenance for this work and he did not think the Construction Committee had a fair chance to look at that. All of the bids that were turned in the hours are different, the amounts of turf and size of plant beds are all different because personnel measured themselves.

Dr. Levey closed the public comment period.

Ms. Mackie noted the failure to include the required narrative, the failure to include the staffing levels with resumes, failure to include references and failure to include the certificate of liability insurance. The Construction Committee felt that the absence of that information left them with a disadvantage in terms of allocating points to the other items outside of price. Dr. Levey stated that by including HHLC the District would be subjecting themselves to appeal from the other proposers.

Ms. Kost asked about accountability for the new company once they are awarded the contract. The District can hold them accountable through the performance bond if a change needs to be made. The proposers estimated the number of days or hours they would spend and if t takes more than that to meet the performance standard they are obligated to provide that.

Mr. Tinetti asked if post bid did the District receive the information that was missing from HHLC. Ms. Mackie responded that the District cannot accept information post bid but they did not receive any additional information.

On Motion by Mr. Tinetti, second by Ms. Kost, with all in favor, the Board of Supervisors for the Greeneway Improvement District adopted the rankings provided by the Construction Committee for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Services - Tavistock Lakes and Laureate Boulevard & Nemours Parkway Section 1 as Cepra ranked as #1, Down to Earth ranked as #2, BrightView ranked as #3, Carol King ranked as #4, Omega Scapes as #5 and Helping Hand Lawn Care deemed non-responsive and authorized District staff to send out the notice of award letters. Section 2 as Down to Earth ranked as #1, Cepra ranked as #2, BrightView ranked as #3, Omega Scapes ranked as #4, Carol King as #5 and Helping Hand Lawn Care deemed non-responsive and authorized District staff to send out the notice of award letters. Section 3 as Cepra ranked as #1, Down to Earth ranked as #2, BrightView ranked as #3, Omega Scapes ranked as #4, Carol King as #5 and Helping Hand Lawn Care deemed non-responsive and authorized District staff to send out the notice of award letters

4

TWELFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS		Consideration of Resolution 2019-06, Approving a Preliminary Budget for Fiscal Year 2020 and Setting a Public Hearing Date

Ms. Walden presented the preliminary budget for Fiscal Year 2020. There is an increase being proposed in the expenses to $921,167.85. District staff is also suggesting August 20, 2019 as the public hearing date.

Ms. Walden discussed the increase to assessments. The most it would be going up is $35.41. The total dollar amount increase is $90,000.00. Ms. Mackie stated that reclaimed water had a significant increase from the prior year based on actuals. Ms. Walden explained the increases to the budget such as irrigation repairs, landscaping, legal advertising, and tree trimming. Many increases have to do with additional sections coming online. Mr. Kaufmann explained that one of the areas coming online is Nemours Parkway Phase 6. Staff included the increase for the website fee and ADA auditing services. The Board discussed the hurricane line item and street lighting line items.

Mr. Tinetti asked who was damaging the irrigation and if the District is going after them. The Construction Committee stated that the most damage is in Nemours Parkway which is typically caused by the builders and they are going after those responsible as much as they can because it is hard to know who caused the damage.

Ms. Mackie explained the notice requirements for the budget increase. Ms. Kost suggested that the cover letter include information clarifying what the COD covers.

On Motion by Mr. Tinelli, second by Ms. Kost, with all in favor, the Board of Supervisors for the Greeneway
Improvement District approved Resolution 2019-06, Approving a Preliminary Budget for Fiscal Year 2020 and Setting a Public  Hearing  Date for August 20, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. at the  Lake Nona Lakehouse, 13623
Sachs Avenue, Orlando, FL 32827.	I

THIRTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Review and Acceptance of Fiscal Year 2018 Audit

Ms. Walden explained that this was a standard and clean audit. There were no deficiencies in internal controls that would be considered material weaknesses. Ms. Walden requested a motion to accept the Fiscal Year 2018 Audit.

On Motion by Mr. Tinetti, second by Ms. Kost, with all in favor, the Board of Supervisors for the Greeneway Improvement District accepted the Fiscal Year 2018 Audit.

FOURTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

s

Ratification	of	Requisition Nos. 651 - 653 Approved in

April	2019	in	an	amount totaling $998.00

Board Members reviewed Requisition Nos. 651 -653 Approved in April 2019 in an amount totaling $998.00.

Ms. Walden noted that these have already been approved and paid and just need to be ratified by the Board.

On Motion by Ms. Kost, second by Mr. Tinetti, with all in favor, the Board of Supervisors for the Greenaway Improvement District ratified Requisition Nos. 651 - 653 Approved in April 2019 in an amount totaling
$998.00.

FIFTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS		Ratification of Operation and Maintenance Expenditures Paid in April 2019 in an amount totaling $72,805.11

Board Members reviewed the Operation and Maintenance Expenditures paid in April 2019 in an amount totaling $72,805.11. Ms. Walden noted that these have already been approved and paid and just need to be ratified by the Board.

On Motion by Ms. Kost, second by Mr. Tinetti, with all in favor, the Board of Supervisors for the Greeneway Improvement District ratified the Operation and Maintenance Expenditures paid in April 2019 in an amount totaling $72,805.11

SIXTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS		Recommendation	of	Work Authorizations/Proposed Services

Mr. Kaufmann presented a work authorization from Donald W. McIntosh Associates in the amount of
$600.00 for the sketch and description for the temporary drainage easement.

On Motion by Mr. Tinetti, second by Ms. Kost, with all in favor, the Board of Supervisors for the Greenaway Improvement District approved the Work Authorization from Donald W. McIntosh in the amount of $600.00 for the sketch and description for the temporary drainage easement.

SEVENTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Review of District's Financial Position and Budget to Actual YTD

6

Ms. Walden stated that no action is required. District staff is continuing to monitor the cash flow situation and the expenses each month.

EIGHTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports

District Counsel -

District Manager - District Engineer -

Ms. Mackie stated that District staff will work on sending out the notice of award letters for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Services. She wanted to make the Board aware that the District has had prior conversations with Helping Hand Lawn Care, LLC who was deemed non­ responsive and they may send in a protest letter. The Board will be made aware at the next meeting if the District does receive such letter.

Ms. Walden noted that the next meeting is Tuesday, June 18, 2019.

Mr. Newton circulated the Construction Contract Status Memorandum (Minutes Exhibit 8). This includes Devo's report on Nemours Parkway Phase 6. Devo determined that there has been a change with how the ground water moves through this area and the ground water is seeping along the old original ground line. He described where the erosion is taking place. He explained Devo's recommendation.

Mr. Newton presented Change Order No. 4 in the additive amount of
$77,713.83 for erosion repair and expanded protection at the north and south ends of the quad 36" culverts.

Mr. Newton presented a supplemental proposal from Devo in the amount of $8,970.00 for CEI services during construction of erosion repair and expanded protection.

On Nemours Phase 6 the recommended motion would be to approve Change Order No. 4 in an amount not to exceed $77,713.83 and authorize the District Engineer to execute upon completion of review and negotiation with the contractor and Geotech consultant.

The second part of the recommended motion would be to approve work authorization from Devo Engineering in the amount of $8,970.00 for CEI services.

Mr. Newton presented an update for Nemours Parkway Phase 7. He noted that they are scheduled to pave beginning June 3, 2019. Mr. Newton presented Change Order No. 2 in the additive amount of $12,879.00 to add sanitary and reclaim serve laterals intended to serve the Nemours Children's Hospital. This change order amount is to be reimbursed to the District for this work by Nemours Hospital.

Ms. Kost asked what would happen if the District did nothing related to the culvert erosion on Nemours Parkway Phase 6. Mr. Newton said that it is
7

working its way back toward the road and it could eventually undermine the road. It could also undermine those pipes which could settle and the joints would come apart. It is a critical issue that the District Engineer wants to correct before the rainy season starts.

Dr. Levey asked if there is another option for materials testing and inspection. Mr. Kaufmann stated that the Construction Committee can go back and talk to Devo or get a price from PSI. Dr. Levey stated that is worth exploring. In the approval is a maximum not to exceed and encourage staff to find efficiencies in the materials testing and inspection. Mr. Kaufmann stated that staff requested the proposal from Devo since he did the analysis and recommendation He is in the best position to direct the work to address the situation.

On Motion by Ms. Kost, second by Mr. Tinetti, with all in favor, the Board of Supervisors for the Greeneway Improvement District approved the recommended motions contained in the Construction Contract Status Memorandum dated May 21, 2019.

Construction Supervisor -	No Report

NINTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS		Supervisor and Audience Comments & Adjournment

There were no Supervisor requests or audience comments. Dr. Levey requested a motion to adjourn.

On Motion by Ms. Kost, second by Mr. Tinetti, with all in favor, the May 21, 2019 Meeting of the Board of Supervisors for the Greeneway Improvement District was adjourned.

Secretary/Assistant Secretary

8

........

Greenew■ylmprovem&nl District
FY 19-20 PropoHd O&M Assessments

GROSS	ASSESSMENTS:

Proposed FY20 0&M NET ASSESSMENT REVENUES:

PropoMd FY20	O&M

TOTAL ERU COUNT:

$911,168
$949,133 4,568

FY2019 O&M NETASSESSMENTREVENUES:	lncre•�•se

$820,64095	590.526.90

FY2019GROSS O&M ASSESSMENTS:	$859,310 00	$89,823.16	9.94%

O&MASSMT.

FYEffec1&-tive20PERAOUPCOSouEnDtfGorRaOllSoScation TOTAL. UNPlATTED ASSESSMENTS: TOTAL. PLATTEDASSESSMENTS:

PER

ERU:

6,11sn
$154
5454939
$494 195

TOTAL EffectiveERU COUNT:	5999.00

,n.n

FY 18-19ADOPTEDGROSS O&M ASSMT PER ERU:	$143.00	$10.69
TOTAL. UNPlATTED ASSESSMENTS:	$449,622.00	$$,31660
TOTAL. PlATTED ASSESSMENTS:	$409688.00	$84,506  $7

�ailing on Pr"8Ne Ph. 3lnformatJon

Untt T

Vol1.me

ERU/Untt

Total ERUs	% ERUs

Unplatted 5.6 19
fliaecl$J  ��  :r�-	Unplatted	Unplalted ERU	O&M Per Unplatted Unit    TOia! Unplatted

ODUU

99488

0.4455

42	101%

211216

�<.t7.ii	�S1u

j!9Si2i.m877:	n2

34o7.5785

5s6s9.116

SS3s.41118s

OU	5n

0.45

305	7%

!TT	iz4,'es	�	�	-.a141	400	180.00	$69.16	$27.664

301.37

L

20381

20.3Sc
.   >n�

OU 	562102

0..4455

25436

61 % 

--o('

0O.

��.--.

�	"'

'SOso 	510622

25425.81	$s6s99 116

$3$78,,804651

Large House/Paired Loi	DU

52	0.45

23	1%

.._ : •	•  > �tu-:"·.•l,,;•.•   •  . ,':>"':r:,;.:. ,.;m	15	1 1s	$69.16	s1.101

.	�".$J.�f/Uif.,�•   \'  _; �193	36	19.98	S84.53	53,011 ·

340  x 9120'0' SSinginglele-F-FaammilyilyLLooi t

DDU

26308

0.4555

121 71	03%%

190ss  ·.; r: BSA   ;,  "  ·	.  "•�;":.. �:: 	101

S69.16	S4,814

1;.

45 x 1200' SSingllee--Famiilly LOiI	DU

244

0.6550

313244	37%

5600 x 130 SSingngllee--FFam lyLLOIot

OOUU

513229

0 9800

412149

go3%,.

:2t	'

�t: <   . ";�: -:	� 	103

1�93:0;�1

s$�1�38:.�32

�$14�.:2:9:5

::::;;: �r:+:?=(.\��=·	�

J7e0wxe1B30oxSLinogise-FamityLoi	DDU

4728

01.0900

4685	1%

-...

49

�

3$	�	•·    .  �	1

121..8155	s$1383.6392

$1s,917n5

8090' x110030' Siinngglle--FFaammiillyyLlOoIt	DDUU

8328

1.310

21%%

�59t,   ;,

"'&U� ::,,	$338�.'11" .

,,

��.949,

23	25.81	S169 06	53,966

65' ·x 130 Single-Family lot	DU

100

0.90

90	2"k

$O' ".,:,"	:J2,$,1,If

:,,,'<'.{" 'r�...',.:n•• �$0

(3398)	(4385.9371)	S119389..7329

-S75..452626

6070'' x 1220'0 Sinngllee--Faamiily Lloott

DU 	2132

0.90

12	o•,.

'IS:     '·  ,   '1f.7     ·. :..:	�· : ·'••  .asse,	0	0 21	S138 32	S32

DU

Zipper Lot	DU		0.65	84
30	2%1%	
Estale Home 65' Loi	DU	95
26	1.20
1.70	114	2%
1%
1%	
Hole
ASpertcimatetynlCsare	Rooms

Unils	346
21.,137131	0.40
0.2350	138	3%
578
8%	
Civic	1.000s1	58,255	0 00	0%	

30 Island Single-Family Lot

DU	94

01..9000

22	0%

� $  :-   •t:�, .t�'t  ;'.f.,:  $3!11'  /'"A; '.!91;844	16	16.40	S153.69	S2.520

•

� t

�

13 . ,•  ; �-a:  ;   J·: ·- .	�::,:,�-:;· .. $15,-m	13	22.10	5261.27	53,396

�� �  · "' :�	;

.::  : $9.1�	1

$9990

0.54

.·  o,   ·'}}(�• A,< '·,,-�,.j� �.  , -�t'i-�;'c·_: f . $0	94	84.29	S13832	S12,955

S•.,\�  -: �

�aul	1 ar "it ;;; :  �•

27	3240	S184.42	$4,979

44

EEssttaa1lee HHomomee 8101'oLoLOt I

DOUU 	30

41	·• �  ·� •,f, �•,S:,_�\I,,, f·7:,;..i;'< ��:,;.   •,·.._}�f,"'' 

�	6	a.10	S207.48	S1.245

O

i,;

,

!,Si22.'sis-

�

l  �     t•  • ,	. •:-   -:.�  :Jt

$61.47	S21.279

"SO

458.34

S70,441

. 4·80O:   ._.,_,,':�:·.·�.'-�>·.� �..�·f--t{�:.	1,833

$38.42

,      'Ct'�·····., �,, �_,,�� ;,\,"  <$0	1,171	351.23	S46.11	$53.979

NMonedimcaedil OcaffilceOff ce

11.,000000sff

313365,.935161

1,59050.0000

91	2"/o

;�,1ai�2;& �1�;�j�i	;;	�.�	i:;;	��

Retail	1.000s1

170,099

1,500.00

113	28%%

-0	�  0 -:''	$'1'9:52,	.;:   so;oo	170,099	113.40	S153.69	S17,428

Tnt111I

=="=,56-8=

100%

2.756	.·1,608    II,". \�   .-.; -   , .:   :...$�4M-,195.
Total	4,568

$454,939

V iIHIHXtl

Assessment
lncrease/(Oecrease)
Unptaned FY 2019	Unptaned

347.58

Unplaned  Unptaned EAU   O&M Per UnplaUed Uni!	To1a1 u,..,iane<t

772
2	0.75

$4.69
$107	$4 69

423	190 35	$64.47	$27,272	$4,69
562	252.88	$64.47	$36 231	$4 69
102	45.81	$64.47	$6,564

28	12.56	$1 ,800	$4.69

$5 73

94	42. 12	$64.47	$6,035

1
67
155

$78.80	S53

37 03
9274

S78.80	$5,306	$5 73
585. 96	$13,287	$6 25

$9 37

261	209 11	$114.62	S29,960	58.33

19

75	67.81	$128 95	$9,716
18.85	$143.27	$2,700	$10.41

$3,698

17	$128.95	$2,228	$9.37
23	25.81	$157 60	$11.46
38	$1 86 25	S7,016
11	9 69	$128 95	$1,389

$2,349

0	0 21	$1 28.95	$30	$9.37

16	16.40	$1 43.27

$10.41

$93.13

94
I	0 54

S1 28.95	$12,077

$6.77

27	32 40	S171.93	$4, 642	$12.50
6	8.10	$193.42	$1,161	$14.06
13	22 10	$243 56	$3,166	$17 70

346	138.45

$19,837	$4.17

2.034	508.59	$35,82	S72,868	$2.60
1,171	351.23	$42.98	$50,321	$3.12
58,255	S0 00	so	so.oo

353.64

136,31 1	90. 87	S143.27	$13,020	$10.41

170,099	113.40	$143.27	$16 247	$10.41	
	3,138		$449,622		

335.956	$1 43 27	$50,667	$10.41

    Total	4,5                                                                                                                                                                           6                                                                                            8	

DONALD w. MCINTOSH
AsSOCIATES, INC.	DATE:	May 21, 2019

MEMORANDUM

EXHIBIT B

TO: FROM: RE:

Greeneway Improvement District Board ofSupervisors
Donald W. McIntosh Associates, Inc. District Engineer
Construction Contract Status

UINO Pt.A,\lNER.S

SuAvEV□Rs

2200 Park Ave. North

Winter Park, FL

32789-2355

Fax 407-644-831 8 407-644-4068
http://www.dwma.com

Dear Board Members,
Please accept this correspondence as a current summary of our, construction contract status. Listed below by project is a brief summary of recent contract activity. Copies of the latest Change Order logs are attached.

Nemours Parkway Phase 6 - Jr. Davis Construction, Inc. / BrigbtView
Construction Status: Final as-built surveys were accepted by the City on April l0, 2019. In accordance with the authorization issued by the District on March 19, 2019, Devo Engineering has completed their assessment and recommendation report addressing the erosion issue at the north and south ends of the quad 36" culverts crossing under the roadway (copy attached). DWMA is coordinating with the contractor and Devo Engineering to implement the recommended repair.
Change Order (C.O.) Status: Change Order No. 4 in the additive amount of $77,713.83 for erosion repair and expanded protection at the north and south ends ofthe quad 36" culverts.
Recommended Motion: Approve Change order No. 4 in an amount not to exceed $77,713.83 and authorize the District Engineer to execute upon completion ofreview and negotiation with the contractor and geotechnical consultant.
Approve work authorization for Devo Engineering in the amount of$8,970.00 for CEI services during construction of erosion repair and expanded protection.

Nemours Parkway Phase 7 - Jr. Davis Construction. Inc.
Construction Status: Installation of underground storm and sanitary sewer systems and pressure utilities (i.e., potable and reclaimed· water systems) have been completed and pressure tested. Video inspection of the sanitary �ewers is anticipated by the first week of June and video inspection of the stonn sewers has been completed. Contractor has completed installation ofcurb �nd gutter and lime rock base. Application ofprime coat is complete, and the first lift ofasphalt is scheduled to be placed beginning June 3, 2019.

F:\Proj2003\232l 6\ENGadmin\C\ecl287docx

Memorandum
Re:		Greeneway Improvement District t:onstruction Contract Status
May 21, 2019
Page 2

Change Order(C.O.) Status: Change Order No. 2 in the additive amount of $12,879.00 to add sanitary and reclaim service laterals intended to serve the Nemours Children's Hospital. This change order amount is to be reimbursed to the District byNemours Hospital.
Reconimended Motion: Approve Change OrderNo. 2 in an amountnot to exceed $12,879.00 and authorize District Engineer to execute same upon completion.

Lake Nona Kellogg Avenue Extension- DeWitt Excavation
Construction Status: The final certification pa<;kage for this projectwas submitted to the City ofOrlando on May 13, 2019.
Change Order (C.O.) Status: None atthis time.
Recommended Motion: None at this time.

Should there be any questions, please advise. Thank you.
End ofmemorandum.

Larry Kaufmann Scott Thacker Troy Davidson Rene Schneider Lance Jackson
James t. Nugent
Tarek Fahmy

F:\Pro·2003QQ�,.

c.\M!sh'cl&INTOSH Associates, Inc.
2200 PARK'AVENUE NORTH, WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789-2355 • (407] 644-4068 • FAX (407) 644-831 8

,	' 1  1 '

ROOT CAUSE ASSESSMENT & RECOMMENDED REMEDJAL MEASURES SOIL UN0ERMINING & ENTRY INTO BARRELS OF RCP CULVERT CROSSING (4@36")

C ,••

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
12051 CORPORAE BLVD , ORLANDO. FL 32517

DEVO SEEREERAM, PH.D., P.E., LLC CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FLORIDA REGISTRATION No. 48303

'lo:

(])ate: May 16, 2019

Board of Supervisors

Phone: 407-382-3256

Greeneway Improvement District CDD 12051 Corporate Blvd.
Orlando FL 32817

I(l)wo's <Project 7'/um6er: 19-879.06

attention:

f••••••••••••-••••••••••••••n•••••• •••••••••-••••••••••••• •1

.!RicltARd lEVEy .,. CIIAiRMAN.!

............ .....................................................

&

�f
ROOT CAUSE ASSESSMENT	RECOMMENDED REMEDIAL MEASURES
Sou UNDERMINING & ENTRY INTO BARRELS Of RCP CULVERT CROSSING (4@36")
Nemours Parkway Phase 6
Lake Nona South, Cltv of Orlando, Florida Dear Mr. Levey:
1.0	Problem Statement & Objectives
Exhibit 1.1 showsthealignment ofthe very recently constructed Phase 6 of Nemours Parkway withinthe Lake Nona development. As noted, this roadway segment traverses a majorsouthward flowing wetland slough by filling an earth embankment to a height ofover 12+ ft above the bed ofthe channels. Exhibit 1.2 shows that there are two
(2) well-defined channels within this slough, and culvert crossings have now replaced both open channels.
The eastern channeloftheslough is the primaryconveyanceand it is now replaced with a large concrete boxculvert (2 @ 12' x 8'), while the western ditch is smaller in cross-section and that was replaced with a 177-ft long, +barrel 36" diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) culvert. The latter is the subject ofthis investigation and it is referred to herein as the "Quad 36". The end treatments on both the north and south sides of this culvert is a mitered end section with concrete slab. The invert ofthe Quad 36 is flat at +72.8 ft NAVO and the flow direction in this channel c:an go north or south depending on the intensity ofthe storm. Lower intensity storms results in a northward flow through the culvert and flood type events go from north to south.
Exhibit 1.3 shows an elevation cross-section through the roadway embankment along the length of the Quad 36.

Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer	Page I

:1	I	PROPOSED GRADE	!	:.	·	· : J

Exhibit 1.1	Nemours Parkway Phase 6 within Lake Nona

:

li--2	f 15D

i
@ o.4o%

.

:i EXISTING GRAD

I	•	:

'.I

�,.

r

,I_

J-  -+I

!

I

�J -:-:::	.J

t'Jii.F 4-36"

l	I	I i

l�I V 7  .�a·.:.

Rt,j�

,:	,

iJ. L.VE· , R'TS•

:! !:

iE..xh....i.b..i.t...1....2..!..........:C...r.o..s..s.:-..s..e..c..t.i.o.n....v..i.e..wi•••o••f•••Q•i.u..a..d....3.:6....a..nd.... .bo.....x...c.'u...lv...e..r.t.:..........:.......... ........ i  ......•..........l......... ........ · 	J..:

Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer	Page 2

Exhibit 1.3	Cross-section view under road embankment at quad 36
Significantsandaccumulationand soil undermining have been obseived adajcentto and withinthetwo(2)western barrels ofthe Quad 36 as seen in Photos 01 to 04. Thisphenomenon isoccurring on both the south and north sides, with more severe undermining and soil loss along the westernmost barrel on the south. There is also undermining ofthe concrete mitered end wall and accumulation ofsand atthe channel bed at both ends. Sand has now in-filled the 2 westernmost pipe barrels with significant accumulations at the entry points.

Photo 01.	Sand accumulation at north end of quad 36 (April 1, 2019)
Greeneway Improvement District CDD has requested that we inveStigate the root cause of this soil transfer from the embankment into the channel and the soil undennining adjacent to the pipe barrel, and also to provide a conceptual remedial plan. From review ofthe aerial photo during construction, the procedure for constructing such adverts within ditches appears to have been followed with thefirststep being to backfill the ditch with compacted earth, well-point and then excavated a trench to place the Quad 36.

Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer	Page 3

Photo 02.

...,.,.),

___

North end ofquad 36 (March 19, 2019)

South end of quad 36 (Mardi 19, 2019)

Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer	Page 4

Photo 04.
Inspection of Photo 4 shows thatthe pipe joints were wrapped in fabric and are not breached which suggests that the soil loss is not related to any pipe joint leaks, usually a first suspicion with this type of infrastructure.
2.0	Channel Genesis

An understanding of the channel is an important first step in such an assessment. A sequence of historical aerial photos are shown in Exhibits 2.1 to 2.6 with a zoom out and zoom in image of the Quad 36 alignment on the following aerial dates: 1941, 1951, and 1954. From review ofthese aerials, it is clearthat this culvert Is not within the original neck of the wetland slough but on the western edge of the slough in a former upland area which was excavated to create a ditch for the early citrus operations at Lake Nona. The cross-section in Exhibit 1.2 shows a high mound to the east of the Quad 36 and that is also not natural high ground but a spoil pile from the ditch excavation.
When ditches are excavated into uplands, theydrawdown the water table adjacent to the ditch and in this case the water table drawdown is on the western side toward the uplands. The cross-section in Exhibit 1.2 is instructive in that it shows the seasonal high watertable relativetotheditch bottom: +76 ftcompared to a ditch bottom elevation of +72 ft which means that there is at least 4 ft of drawdown induced by the ditch during the normal wet season, and even more when there is above average rainfall.

Devo Seereeram. Ph.D., P.E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer	Page 5

r

r•.....,IIIIIW<WW.W.....
�

tI�

i

iI

Exhibit 2.1	Quad 36 on 1944 aerial (zoom out)

"l...�,....,..,.....................................-.,.,_.._.,..,.,........,.........._,,...M:ff�..a,:,

Exhibit 2.2	Quad 36 on 1944 aerial (zoom in)

Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer	Page 6

Exhibit 2.3	Quad 36 on 1951 aerial (zoom out)

Exhibit 2.4	Quad 36 on 1951 aerial (zoom in)

Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer	Page 7

Exhibit 2.5	Quad 36 on 1954 aerial (zoom out)

Exhibit 2.6	Quad 36 on 1954 aerial (zoom in)

. .............................. .....................................
Devo Seereeram. Ph.D.. P.E. Consulting Geotechnical Engineer

•...,. ..<>••w•····.... .................,.......:

�

Page 8

3.0	Pre-Construction Topographic Contours at Quad 36
In 2007, this part of Lake Nona was mass graded in preparation for the development which exists today.
Exhibit3.1 shows the contours ofthe land surface prior to the 2007 mass grading at this locality and these contours show the slope undermining was already an issue at this location as tl1egroundwater approached the narrow "goose neck" in the wetland.

-

Exhibit 3.1	Pre-2007 mass grading topo atwest side of Quad 36
Exhibit 3.2 shows tl1e pre-construction topo (post 2007 mass grading) in this locality and it shows more detail of the ditch and tl1e key item to note in this exhibit is the bulge in the +73 ft contour into the ditch on the north end ofthe Quad 36. That bulge indicates that sand is being pushed into that location from groundwater forces and tl1is is better explained in Exhibit 3.3 which shows the local flow direction of groundwater from the west to the east toward tl1e ditch.
These exhibits show that tl1ere Is a propensity for the groundwater flow pattern to concentrate and cause soil discharge into the ditch along the western side ofthe Quad 36, especially on the north side where it wants to bulge out and form a sand bar.
Under high water or flood stage conditions, the flow direction in the ditch is from north to south following the regional drainage pattern. However, under lower flow conditions, the flow pattern is from south to north through the channel where it then bends to the east to the enter the primary conveyance ditch at the box culvert which always flows to the south.

Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer	Page 9

Exhibit 3.2	Pre-construction topo at Quad 36, note channel instability on north

Exhibit 3.3	Groundwater seepage direction focused at location of bulge

Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer	Page Io 

4.0	Review ofGeotechnical Data in Locality ofQuad 36
Geotechnical data from the design-level report for Nemours Parkway Phase 6 was reviewed as part of this assessment. Exhibit 4.1 shows the muck probe data in this ditch prior to construction and it does not show any compressible organic substrate which could be impacting the structure. The mucky sand is low in organic content (less than 10%) under the ditch bed is typical ofolder man-made ditches within wetland systems. Natural channels in wetlands contain higher organics which are not disclosed by these muck probe data.

Exhibit 4.1	Muck probe dat..a. along Quad 36
note: SW = standing water, MS = mucky sand, S = sand

Devo Seereeram, Ph.D.• P.E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer	Page 11 

Exhibit 4.2 shows the seasonal high water table estimates along this portion ofthe roadway. Note that due to the irrigation and the height ofthe placed fill, the seasonal high water table will rise even higher than these levels, possibly as high as +78ft NAVDwhich is above the top ofthe Quad 36. Such a high water table elevation will create as much as 6 ft of erosion-inducing driving head at the mitered end sections.

Exhibit 4.2	Seasonal high water table estimates from design report compare to ditch bottom elevation of +72.5 ft NAVD
The soil profiles are shown in Exhibits 4.3 and 4.4 and they both show well compacted sandy soils at the Quad 36 and the TB-1 soil profile shows that the organic content of the mucky sand is only 8.4% which is too low to be of concern for short-term or long-term compression.

i

The construction quality control reports were also reviewed for this portion of Nemours Parkway and these reports indicate that the soil compacton requirements were met for pipe and roadway backfill.

Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer	Page 12 

,  4.•..,. ur,•.·.-.1,1U.

�:!'

!.........�..,...

.. ..,...,
�  un

_,_..,,.._,o

""	r.""...n:,"1\oliplJJ0

.Jl!lff....

P..lrt..(k)-r.,j•'III�>

..., fllw

Exhibit4.3	Soil stratigraphy at TB-1

Exhibit4.4	Soil stratigraphy at TB-2

Deva Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Consulting Geotechnical Engineer

f,u-e,►..,•-;uof•	=

���::�:.p,·J!;

"

lH• ••	�Un•�ntf	1),,
:o.Irr-Ptl•    o,,,.,.,,_."*.-.o."Tl

Page  13 

5.0 Root Cause Explanation

Exhibit 5.1 provides an illustration ofthe rootcauseexplanation ofthesoil loss ofthewedgeofthe soil and the sand accumulation in the channel. The sand is being eroded and undermined with seepage combined with some toe underrutting on the south side of the Quad 36 when the flow direction in the channel is south to north.
The sand bulging into the channel on the north side is due to a natural instability as this is the focal point of discharge for the subregional groundwater flow into the "goose ned<" of this wetland slough. The soil loss on the south side of the Quad 36 is due in part to toe underrutting from the northward flow in the channel but primarily due to the high water table pressure pushing out the fill dirt above and adjacent to the pipe. Note that the natural soil on the south side is stable but the fill material adjacent to the pipe is being eroded.
A new water table will form at the contact of the fill and the original sloping ground and this subterranean water will move to the culvert, where it will be impeded by the pipe side wall and from there migrate to discharge at the culvert openings. The basin for this perched water table under the fill will start at least atthe horse trail and move toward the Quad 36 as shown in Exhibit 5.1.

Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer	Page 14 

f--1-- .............. ....:::::.::.::.::,·::.::.... ��  ..  =...._ 	i.

.... ......................�..._... _,_...... ...... .... ........_J...........................,_....  _r-�,!

l;,---

;

,-,

L .-

,-   -

1r	- t

i--­
! ·

u.	,..

-
�yo,..!

,- 	I

-	-•.•J.....

,-• ••.J
V,i:11'"'

Exhibit 5.1	Root cause explanation ofsoil loss

Devo Seereeram. Ph.D.. P.E. Consulting Ceottchnital Engineer

Page I5

6.0	Concept Retrofit

The retrofit will have to achieve the objective of armoring the slopes around the advert mitered ends with a weighted permeable system (such as riprap or articulating concrete blocks) on a filter fabric to prevent loss ofthe fine sand backfill from the embankment into the channel. Similar armoring over filter fabric is required on the channel bed at the north and south end treatments, and also extending up the sides and above the top of the mitered end concrete slab.
The limits of this protection is shown In Exhibit 6.1.

Exhibit 6.1	Recommended minimum protection limits to prevent soil loss
An impermeable retaining wall such as a concrete or sheetpilewingwall/headwall is not recommended as one ofthe objectives ofthe retrofit system will be to relieve the groundwater pressure at the these locations and allow the groundwater to discharge into the channel. Ifthe groundwater pressure is allowed to build up behind a wingwall, it will seek an outlet point around the ends ofthe wall and transferthe internal soil erosion problem to a new relief points.
FOOT quality rip rap is required at all coverage areas on the channel bed and extending up the slope to 2 ft above the 100 yr flood stage. This higher grade rip rap is recommended since the surface water in the channel is within a wetland system which is typically acidic and tends to disintegrate limestone or broken concrete over time. Lower quality rip-rap may be used 2 ft above the flood elevation ifthere isa significant costsavings to the COD and ifthe aesthetic change in rip-rap appearance is acceptable to the COD.
The thickness of the channel bed and slope armoring rip rap should be at least 12 inches. The filter fabric under the rip rap shall comply with FOOT specifications for similar applications.
Devo Seereeram, Ph.D , P E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer	Page 16 

For extra stability within the channel bed, It Is recommended that the � rap be placed inside reno (gabion) mattresses on filter fabric. For extra stability on the side slopes, it is recommended that the rip rap be placed in a wire tied mesh (aka wire-enclosed rip rap mesh).
Prior to placement ofthe rip rap, the subgrade soils will have to regraded and compacted before placing the filter fabric layer. In eroded zonesbetween the pipesand atthe sides ofthepipes which are diffirultto compact especially below the springline, flowable fill shall be used as backfill.
Broken concrete rip rap is required as a diffuser atthe cross-pipe outfall pointatthe horse trail which flows to the western side of the southern mitered end of the quad 36" RCP culvert (refer to Exhibit 6.1).
It is also recommended that the repair work be monitored by the CDD's quality control geotechnical engineer to ensure compaction of the backfill, placement of the filter fabric with sufficient overlap, and other aitical items.
The sand from the pipes will have to de-silted by a specialty pipe cleaning contractor.

Wetrustthatthegeotechnical data,evaluation, and concept recommendations communicated in thisreportaredear and responsive to the needs of the design engineer. Feel free to contact us if there are any questions or if any clarifications are needed.
Sincerely,

:

7•••••••••••••••••••••••••w...,•••••..•••••••••••••••..••••..••••••..•••h•u•••••U•••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••u•••••••••••••••••n•oooooou,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,._,,,,, ,on•••••• ••  •••••-•••••,.  ••·
j

!	l

l!    ��o  ;w.r� �	i
Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.

I

Florida Registration No. 48303	[
•j..D•..a••t••e••:••M••••a••y•••.1.•6••,•..2••.0.•1••9•..•••••••••••••....••••..•••••..••••••u••..,..••....•..••••••••"'--••""•••..........................,.............u.•••••••..•..•••••••••••••••..••••.....,u,.,,,.,,...,,.•

Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer	Page J 7

1	
7/10r'2018	a·	
0	
$	10,874.88	
Approved	52,070,587.60

s	2,081,46248	
7/17/2018	
7/17/2018	
2	6/20/2018	Culvert Rai Installation	0	$	13,464.00	Approved	s	2,094,92648	7/17/2018	7/17/2018	

;!	7/16/2018	OCPSsidewalk revision	30	$	42,220.54	Approved	s	2,137,147.02	
7/17/2018	
7/17/2018	

C.0.#	Date	DeKrlpdon ot Revision	Addlll-1

LAKE NONA SOUTH
Greeneway Improvement District Nemours Parkway Phase 6 Change Order Log
Jr. Davis
Amount	Sbltu8	CorvactNewAmounl

To Board	Apprcwal Date	NotH

Dlrectior\al Bore

Days

Orlglrel81C<nnlCI17/17

Data

4	5/20.12019    Enorosrthioandn respaou�lharedndesxpoarnthededquparotde3c61"iocnualvtethrtse 	0

F:\forms\Construction\Loos\CDO LOGS xis

$	77,713.83	Perding	$	2,214,860.85

CO NemOtXS 6 Greenway (3)

5/21/2019

5/21/2019	Page 1

Greeneway Improvement District
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER

Project:	Nemours Parkway Phase 6 Engineer:	Donald W. McIntosh Associates, Inc. Contractor: Jr. Davis Construction, Inc.

Erosion Repair and Expanded Protection at the North and South Ends of the Qual 36" Culverts

ITEM NO.	WORK PERFORMED

Change Order No. 	0-04
Date---5-/21-/20-19

DESCRIPTION OF	AMOUNT CHANGE		I (-)

ADD

$77,713.83

COMMENTS:

Net Change Order Amount -:...$--77-'--,71-3.8-3 Contract Amount Prior to Change Order $ 2,137,147.02
Revised Contract Amount $ 2,214,860.85 See detailed backup provided by Jr. Davis Construction, Inc.

Acceptable To:

Approved By:

Jr. Davis Construction Inc.

Greenaway Improvement District

Date:

Date:

l\dmadatasldwmadata\Pro)2014\14052\CONSTadmin\Prod\CP171 -CO-04.xlsx

NEMOURS PARKWAY PHASE 6 SCOUR PROTECTION

I �-	-

J2R10.S.DHAOAVGLISANCD OBLNVDS. TRUCTION

,.liliiii!III

KCoISnStaIcMMEt:	E, FLC3O47N4O1R MACNAMARA

Jr. Dim, Con'1'tvdi0l'IComp<111y, Inc,

PEhmoaniel::	4C0O7N-8O70R-0.M06A6CNAMRA@JR-DAVIS.COM

Revision Date:

Quote To:	Greeneway Improvement District	PrQposal Date:	5/17/19
Date ofPlans:

llO  GENERAL CONDffiONS

ITEM	DESCRIPTION	QUANTilY   UNIT	UNITPR1CE

AMOUNT

GENERAL CONDITIONS

GENERAL CONDITIONS TOTAL
140  INSTALL SEIRTOFESNIOCEN CONTROL

1.00	LS
1.00	LS

7,800.00

$77,,880000..0000

EROSION CONTROL TOTAL

150  INSTALL FLOL ATING TURBIDITY BARRIER	1.00	LS

350.00
1,200.00

350.00
Sl1,,525000..0000

SYSTEM	5,158.33

162  SILT REMCOLVEAAL FNRINOMG/FEXLISUTSINHING STGORM	1.00	LS

LS

CLEANING/ FLUSHING TOTAL
180  EXCEAXVCAATEVATION & PREPARATION

5,158.33

$5,158.33

190  FLEOXWCAABVLAETFIILOLN & PREPARATION TOTAL

1.00	5,200.00
1.00	LS	2,898.00

5,200.00
$82,,809988..0000

QUAD PIPE OUTLETS

20.65

220  GABION MSACTORUESRSEPSRWOITTHERCIPTIROANP AT	650.00	SF
230  WPIPIREEOMU1ELSHETWSITH RIP RAP SLOPES AT QUAD	2,000.00	SF 	18.50

13,422.50
37,000.00

240  RIP RAPSACTOSUIRNGPLREOPTIEPCETOIUOTNLTEOTTAL
270  RESODBAHIARESTORATION

30.00	SF	850
650.00	SY

$50,267575..0500

GRAND TOTAL

SY

280 RESOD ST.AUGUSTINE	78.00	SY

3.00

1,950.00

NOTES:

290  SIDEWALKRREESPTLOARCAEMETIONNTTOTAL

10.00
34.00	50.00

780.00
$41,,740300..0000
$77,713.83

Page 1 of 2

nns PROPOSAL IS INCLUSIVE OFTHE ADDED SCOUR PROTECTION REMEDIATION PER THE PLAN
REVISION/ SKETCH RECEIVED ON 5/16/l 9

BOND EXCLUDED PERMITS EXCLUDED

IDC Reference:1925RFCO06 CC:TBD

Page 2 of2

DONALD W. MCINTOSH ASSOCIATES, INC.
2200 ParkAvenue North
Winter Park, Florida 32789-2355 Telephone: 407-644-4068 ext. 127
Fax: 407-644-8318
Email: jjnewton@dwma.com
•DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY - The data contained withinthise-mail is the sole property of Donald W. McIntosh Associates, Inc.
{"DWMA") and la tranamitted to you atyourrequestforyoi.r convenience. Theuserofthis data a&Sumes all liability resulting rrom such use and hereby releases DWMA rrom liability ofany nature, expressed or Implied, relating to the data contained thereon. All Information contained on said data Is subject to change at the discretion of DWMA. DWMA isnot responsible to the recipient for compatlbllilywith the recipient's hardware and/orsoftware. It Is Imperative that the user checks this data for vruses.

From: Devo Seereeram <devo@devoeng.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 9:48 AM
To: Randy Thomas <rthomas@acfenv.com>
Cc: Jeffrey J. Newton, PE <iinewton@dwma.com>; Zack Titus <TerraaguaZT@aol.com>; James C. Nugent, PE <inugent@dwma.com>; Josh.Huynh@jr-davis.com; Joe Joseph <jjoseph@acfenv.com> Subject: Re: Nemours Parkway Phase 6 redesign
Hi randy, based on our telecom this morning, please include the north side quad pipe outlet also which is on page l of the pdf. the south side quad pipe is on page 2. the no action area is on page 3 but we can utilize some HP-TRM as needed in other areas.
thanks devo
On May 15, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Randy Thomas <rthomas@acfenv.com> wrote:
Okay - let me propose that we only do the southern end of the Quad pipe outlet and let's include a couple of rolls of High Performance Turf Reinforcement Mat- HPTRM forthe surrounding areaswhich can be field identified as erosion-proned areas.
South Side Quad Pipe Outlet:
6 ~	PVC-Coated 9' X 6' X 12" reno mattresses
6 Layers ~	9' X 36' long wire mesh

This Layout will require the following quantities:
6 ~	PVC-Coated 9' X 6' X 12" reno mattresses
2 Rolls ,.	9' X 150' long wire mesh 150 lbs "'	9 gauge tie wire
l Roll ~	FOOT Type D2 Geotextile (ACF HSP2)

2 Rolls ,.
determined)

Pyramat HPTRM and associated anchor pins (quantities of Pyramat to be field

Please confirm this revised revetment plan and we can provide pricing to Josh. Thank you!
Randy Thomas, PE I South Regional Engineer
Cell: (321) 604-0868 I www.acfenvironmental.com
<image00l.png> <image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png>
5

ta:

! !l>wa'6 5'�.Na: Not Yet Assigned

:Dau: May 21, 2019
.......••••-•-••--•-•••••-••.....•n..•••.............................,11tHNOtuuouuulll_......._.,.,.._,............n,-•o•-•---u••-••••••-••••n-M■1,ro■_,,..,__..,,

Board of Supervisors
Greeneway Improvement District 12051 Corporate Blvd.
Orlando, Florida 32817

....	-	--	........-......-

phone: 407-382-3256;
.............. .......  ...,    ·
attention: ILR._.i.c_ lt.A...n...d.....L...e..v._y .. .C·-ltA,_iR.M,,.AN!•

,S·-U-·P··P·-L--E·-M··-E·N·-T·-A..-L·.P...R...O..-P..O..S...A_�L,,...F.IOR INSPECTION SERVICES

file/,:

.,

����RS PARKWAYP.���E Lake Nona, Orlando, FL
Dear Mr. Levy,
This proposal is for providing inspection services of the proposed remedial works at the Quad 36 culvert crossing under Nemours Parkway Phase 6 at Lake Nona. The end treatments ofthis 4-barrel pipe has experienced soil loss, erosion, and undermining and the Greeneway Improvement District COD Is about to undertake stabilization and rebuilding ofthe mitered end sections on both the north and south sides. The plan calls for stabilizing the channel bed and the side slopes around both mitered end sections with rip-rap weighted filterfabric to prevent soil loss. Backfilling oftheeroded zones and the rip-rap footprint will be done with soil and flowable fill for "hard to reach" zones. Our services will include compaction testing of the backfill areas. We estimate that the construction duration to be no more than 30 working days if weather conditions permit. We have allowed for part-time inspection services although full time inspection will be performed for critical operations such as backfilling, fabric placement, and armoring. An itemization of our estimated work effort and fee is provided in Table 1.

NEMOURS PARKWAY PHASE 6 · PAGE 1

TABLE 1

Unit

Descriotion	Unit	Rate	Otv	To�I

Senior Project Engineer

i	hr	I $100.00 I 24.00 I	$2,400.00

•P•• r.in.uic..i•p•.Ha••l••E•  •n•.g..i.n••e••-er•n•owu••••w••n•--u,,   ......... -••--•••-•n-• •••'•..•---•••-.,nn'f-!---••h••-r-•n•H'f-!••$w12u•0••-.0..0..••tI..••1..2.......__..00..,,i...........$,_1..,.4....4  0,-.0•0n•

Senior Engineering Technician (will also perfonn compaction)	!	hr	$60.00  I 80.00 i	$4,800.00

.P...r_oct_,.o,,r_Te..s.,t_(b..a..s_e,.l.i.n,.e__de,.n..s..i..t.y...f.o_r.co....m...p...a._c.t..io_n_),._............-····-..··t'""e··a....h...... ,.-......-. ....i�.........--..J..................-...·-·-····

••u--..•••....-•••••-..••..••-••n•••-.....................•••u-•ooon_,.._,,_.....................••--•••••--•••¼•-•••••-• •••f-••-•••••--••nt•..•....•..•- 	•••••-•n•-•••• •--••••
.	_....m....................J.	c  ... .�.?.���.. -.�:.�. 	..-�.����.
Technical Assistant	!	hr	$40.00 '	0.00 !		$0.00 Total					l	$8,970.00
CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION

If this proposal is acceptable, please review and sign the contract authorization page in the Attachment.
Weappreciate the opportunity to provide this proposal for your review and trust that it covers the work needed. Please feel free to contact us ifthere are any questions.
g)emw e�
Dennis C Miller Administrative Assistant

NEMOURS PARKWAY PHASE 6 - PAGE2

AUTHORIZATION

To authorize this proposal, please complete the infonnation requested and return by mail or fax.
TABLE A.I: AUTHORIZATION OF OFFER
This offer is authorized only when signed below otherwise it should be considered a draft.
Authorization signature:
�Mo  fl.U/� rn
Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.

To authorize this work, please complete the infonnation below and return a copy of the executed authorization to:
Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. 5500 Alhambra Drive Orlando, Fl 32808
Phone: 407-290-2371; devo@devoeng.com

TABLE A.2: AUTHORIZATION BY CLIENT

Proposal Authorized on this Authorized Signature ••.•.• Print Name & ntle  . . . . . . .
Company name  . . . . . . • . . 
Company address  ....•... 

Company phone # . . . . . . . 
Company fax #  . . . . . . . .. 
Cellular/mobile phone #   ... 
E-mail address ••.••.•••. 

.....................day of .........................-.....2019...-. ...·-·--...--...··-·····----·..········

NEMOURS PARKWAY PHASE 6 · PAGE 3

TERMS & CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT

Special terms and conditions (if any) and general conditions of this agreement are contained in the following tables.

TABLE AJ: SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT
1
   2	

TABLE A.4: GENERAL CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT	
1	PARTIES AND SCOPE Of WORK: Devo seereeram Ph.D., P.E. (hereinafter referred to as "Devo") shall be perfonnlng the work. 'Work" means the specific geotechnlcal Investigations, testi ng, and engineering orother service performed by Devo as set forth above. "Oient" refers to the person or business entity ordering the work to be done by Devo. Ifthe Client Is ordering the work on behalf of anotfler, the Olent represents and warrants that the Olentisthe duly autflorized agentofsaid partyforthe purpose ofordering and directing said work Theordering of work from Devo shalloonstitllte acceptance ofthe terms of Devo's proposal and these General Conditions.	
2	PAYMENT: Invoices wlll be submitted upon completion ofworkoratmonthly Intervals forcontinuing projects. Payment terms are Net 30 Days, unless alternative arrangements are stated under the Specific Conditions. Charges at 1½% per month will be levied on invoices notpaidwithin30 days from invoice date. Olentagrees to pay Devo'scost ofcollection ofall amounts due and unpaid after 60 days, lnduding courtcosts, reasonable attorney's fees, filing fees, and certified mail poslage. Fallure to make payment within 30 daysofinvoice shall ronstltute a release of Devo from any and all dalms which Oient may have, either in tort, or contract:, and whether known or unknownat the time.	
3	OBLJGATION TO PAY: Devowill perform services under this agreementwith professionalskill and care. Devo does not guarantee Governmental or Regulatory Agency approval ofOient's project. Client'sobligation to pay for Devo's services IsIn noway dependent upon Oient's abilityto obtain financing, payment from third parties, approval of Government or Regulatory Agencies, or upon Olent's successful completion of project.	

NEMOURS PARKWAY PHASE 6 • PAGE 4

TABLE A.4: GENERAL CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT
4 ACCESS TO SITE: Cftent grants Devothe right ofentry tothe project by Devo, his employees, agents, and subcontractors In orderto perfonn the servires under this agreement Ifthe Oientdoes not own the project, Olent warrants and represents toDevo that Olenthastheauthority and pennisslon ofthe owner and occupant of the project site to grant this right ofentry to Devo.
Devo shall take reasonable measures and precautions to minimize damage to the project site from Devo's activities and use of equipment  dient recognizes that the performanoe of the services lnduded In this Agreement may cause alteration or damage tothesite. Client accepts the fact that this Is Inherent In the work and will not look to Devo for reimbursement or hold Devo liable or responsible for any alteration or damage required toperform our scope ofwork. Should the Client notbethe owner ofthe property, then dient agrees to notify the owner of the aforementioned possibility or unavoidable alteration and damage and to idemnlfy, and defend Devoagainst any dalms by the ownerorpersons having possession of the site through the owner which are related to such alteration or damage.

Devo

Devo has not induded.in his fee the rost of restoration of damage which may occur. If Oient desires or requires Devo to restore the site to its former condition, Devo will, upon written request, perform additional work as is necessary to do so and the Oient agrees to pay the cost thereof.
5	DAMAGE TO EXISTING MAN-MADE OBJECTS: deleted.	
6

7

8	SAMPLE DISPOSAL: Unless otherwise agreed, laboratory test specimens or samples wlll be dlsposm immediately uponcompletion ofthe test All samples or specimens collectedfrom soil boringswill be disposm sixty (60) daysafter submission of Devo's report.
WARRANTY ANDUMITATION OF UABILITY: Devo's geotechnlc.al engineering services wlll be performed In accordanc.e with his proposal and with generally accepted principles and practices. In performing his professional services, Devo will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of his profession. This warranty Is in lieu of all other warranties and representations, either e.xpress or implied. Statements made In Devo's reports are opinions basm on engineering judgement and are not to be construed as representations of fact.
INDEMNITY: SUbject totheforegoing llmlt.ations, Devoagrees to indemnifyand hold Clientharmless from and against any and all dalms, suits, costs, and expenses, Including reasonable attorney's fees and court costs arising outofDevo's negllgenc.e to the extent of Devo's negligence. Cientshall provide the same protection to the extent ofits negllgenoe. In the event that Oientor Olent's prlndpal shall bring any suit, cause ofaction, daim or counterdaim against Devo, the party initiating such action shall pay to Devo the costs and e.xpenses inrurred byDevoto investigate, answer and defend it, lnduding reasonable attorney's fees, witness fees, and court costs tothe extent that Devo shall prevail In suet, a suit	
9	THIRD PARTY REUANCE: The services under this Agreement are being perfonned for and on behalf of the Client forthe Oient'sexdusiveuse. Devoassumesno responsibility forthird partyuse ofor rellanoe on Devo's findings, opinions, ronduslons, or recommendations unless such use or rellanc.e by Third Parties is authonzed In writing by Devo.	
10	ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreementronstttutes the entire understanding of the parties, and there are no representations, warranties, undertakings made other than as set forth herein. This agreement may be modified only in writing, signed by each of the parties hereto.	
11	CANCELLATION: This contract is canoellable by either party at any time for any reason.  Work performed to the time ofnotice shall be paid asInterpolated within and defined by the contract. All such work shall become the property ofthe Olent upon such payment	

NEMOURS PARKWAY PHASE 6 - PAGE 5

LAKE NONA SOUTH
Greeneway Improvement District Nemours Parkway Phase 7 Change Order Log
Jr. Davis

Days

C.0. #	Date	Desc:rtptton ofRevision	Addltlonal

Contract adjustment for revision to lnc\Jde 2/'S/2019 scopeofworkfor addendums/plans issued

5/20/2019

after bid date.

2

Acid oanilary and recl aim service laterals intended to servethe Nemours Childrens's Hosp-al.

F:\Fonns\Constructlonlloos\CDD LOGS.xis

New
Amount	Status	Comae! Amount
Original Conlract Dale
$6,312,276.78

$	161,445.97      Approved	$	6,473,722.75

$	12879.00	Pending	$	6,486,601.75

CO Nemours 7 GreeffMly

To Board	Approval Date	Notes

2/1912019	2/19/2019

5121/2019

5/20/2019 Page1

Greeneway Improvement District
CONTRACTCHANGE ORDER

ITEM NO.

Project:	Nemours Parkway Phase 7 Engineer:	Donald W. McIntosh Associates, Inc. Contractor:	Jr. Davis Construction Company
WORK PERFORMED

1

Add Sanitary and Reclaim Service Laterals Intended to Serve the Nemours Children's Hospital

Change Order No	2

Date  	__.;.5..;;;..;;./20/..;;;..;;.20_19

DESCRIPTION OF	AMOUNT CHANGE		+ I (·)

ADD

$	12,879.00

COMMENTS:

Net Change Order Amount---$ 	----'12,-879-.00-
Contract Amount Prior to Change Order $ 6,473,722.75 Revised Contract Amount   $ 6,486,601.75

Acceptable To:

Approved By:

Jr. Davis Construction

Greeneway Improvement District

Date:

Date:

c: Jeffrey J. Newton, P.E.

F:\Proj2016\16106\CONSTadmin\Prod\Change Orders\CP161.xlsx

NEMOURS PH. 7 - ADDED HOSPITAL LATERALS

- - -	JR210.S.DHAOAVIGLASNCD OBLNVDS. TRUCTION

KCoISnStaIMMct:

EE, FLJIMI3474D1 UGAN

Jr. DovisColi.tfvction Compo11y,Inc.	PEhmoa_nilc::	3Jll2\1U-6.2D4U-8G60A3N@JR-DAVIS.COM

Quote To:

GREENEWAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

Proposal Date: RDeavteisoiofnPDlaaatse: :

5.20.19
1.30.18
9.12.18

ITEM

DESCRIPTION

QUAN1TfY

UNIT	UNIT PRICE

AMOUNT

 	SANITARY SEWER	

10
20

30

40
50
60
70

GRAND TOTAL

8" SDR26 PVC (12-14' CUT)
4' DIAMETER SANITARY MANHOLE (12-14' DEEP)(105A)
TESTING SPAENRICTIATYRYSTSAENWDEARRTDOSTAL
RECLAIMED WATER
4'' PVC C900 DR18 REUSE (W/FITTINGS)
4"              GATE              VALVE BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY TESTINGRPEECRLCAIIMTYESDTWANADTAERRDTSOTAL

27.00
1.00

1.00

54.00
1.00
1.00
1.00

LF	42.60
EA	7,800 00

LF

LS	140.40

EA

33.10

EA

1,040.00
821.00
LS	14000

1,150.20
7,800.00
$9,014900..6400 1,787.40
1,040.00

$3,788.40

821.00
140.00

$12,879.00

NQJESi
THIS PROPOSAL IS INCLUSIVE OF nrn ADDED SANITARY AND RECLAIM SERVICE LATRRALS INTENDED TO SERVE THE NEMOURS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL. ALL OTHER CHANGES NOT SPECIFlED BY THIS PROPOSAL ARE TO BE CONSIDERED NOT INCLUDED.

JDC Reference:

CC:

ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL:
THIS PROPOSAL AND PRICING IS ACCEPTED BY THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURE WITH AGREEMENT TO ALL NOTES AND CLARIFICATIONS HEREIN.

COMPANYNAME:

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE:

Page 1 of2

DATE OF ACCEPTANCE: SIGNATURE OF ACCEPTANCE:

Page 2 of2

LAKE	NONA NEMOURS	PARKWAY	PHASE	7

Pll!PAND FOR

CITY OF ORLAN)(), FLORl>A

----=--� o:m-·�

!iJ

LAKE NONA LAND COMPANY, LLC
8900 TAVISTOCK LAKES BLVD. SllTE 200
ORLAN>O, FL 32827
407.318.8233

-

CONTACT: JAMES L ZBORL

-=-----..,,...-­,

un,n coYP6Nf$

��....

-_=...�­...,T-_=:___-�---.--�

TIO:)__.__.,__ ft;!....._._..

=..... "°'�1..0.-.�•-

_---_�....,­

_,...,.

_...�------_-___--lffiU-�·"""""

,_......_..DC:lln.. ..,. 	lllfta_

�,-,,.·_"""'201�0. lll1.,_00Q4Q. 1011•10047

--""

-....."""'-..·......­­

.-.Mll

 	JAMIARY a o . I         0 1 I	

$1.Joc:.,..I 20J,.O'l,1�,l-,_0001020t71, 2011-100��
Rh&I>  armTTlll 12. I018

-�-....'"'""'.--......'

M..-.-•IIIIIIIAlllilll•---­ 	,..

�-,c�--­

.,.....�

...,_.,..
•:u.e -•cim..

\_ \:·

,.	,.� ...�-- -·· .
, i

1I  ltt'M_.-..U,,7!lf'Ot-,_°""""'.._.. ,"'_"-MLU-IV _...,.._-·��W,,.
......,.=�"-�___�_,,._,_lft.,_l'(ll;•,·111-,i.C""-nq.+.IIJII,	•     I

I

I

�

\\

I

I

1-

\\

,,,

I

I

__. .�·

i
'''.

. •···  \

II

\\

ii
I I

tti,.-1�►1  W-IQl. S.-IOJ,,.�►tI»"'

11      11, �1• .V.0	NG

"'=r=��.�,t::orA�J

} -..,.   'UJII lON0POID \.t"I N-.. p

1l1l4JJ Slt-N--i1lCIII,,l, a111--Illl,.el,.llt 	1117111.►N--)1',11,

�
.\	\

\
\

i - '

\

L  N�-UM-.,_e.___ ._...

..=�t:'e'-:.�:=

�-•c.n•......

1  �•��aa,. ......._

.. -c.....,�,_..�_..,.".,olt:tl[a

--�-■--t'•'Nl�IC•MlllmlDII..

...-...,,CIMllflla...

:,	�-=-�:.":.:..�·=���-

.. U�7�A� 	v
, .�......   . �-..:anfCe.Nil'�l» ...Q�..........,.,.,_  ,._.
a.cnr.•v�.................     .s�111 •111""""'1D

...

..,,oilt<t

. \.\ �,

._  llflU9'1LW'&.,..I..-ICIQ'I- •-.,,,pC,'lllYruW.,tJ_.ID,.,_,a.t__,t.CICAas
� 	r..-.. ::::rff..,. oc c.u.

,.US,... II.

Tarek Fahmy
To:	Conor MacNamara
Cc:	Troy Davidson; Josh Huynh; Jimi Dugan
Subject:	RE: GID Nemours Parkway Phase 7 - Revision to Construction Drawings #2

From: Larry Kaufmann {mailto:lkaufmann@tavistock.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 11:16 AM
To: Troy Davidson <troy.davidson@tavistock.com>
Cc: Josh Huynh <Josh.Huynh@ir-davis.com>; Conor MacNamara <Conor.MacNamara@jr-davis.com>; Tarek Fahmy
<tfahmy@dwma.com>; Jimi Dugan <Jimi.Dugan@ir-davis.com>; Brent Schademan <brent.schademan@tavistock.com>
Subject: RE: GID Nemours Parkway Phase 7 - Revision to Construction Drawings #2
Troy, yes, the intent is run thisthrough the COD and getreimbursed from Nemours Hospital as they have agreed they will do.

KDS

Kaufmann Development Services, LLC Larry Kaufmann, PE
(407) 448-6592
LKaufmann@tavistock.com

From: Troy Davidson
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 10:07 AM
To: Larry Kaufmann <lkaufmann@tavistock.com>
Cc: Josh Huynh <Josh.Huynh@jr-davis.com>; Conor MacNamara <Conor.MacNamara@jr-davis.com>; Tarek Fahmy
<tfahmy@dwma.com>; Jimi Dugan <Jimi.Dugan@ir-davis.com>; Brent Schademan <brent.schademan@tavistock.com>
Subject: RE: GID Nemours Parkway Phase 7 - Revision to Construction Drawings #2
Hey Larry, we discussed this at our Nemours 7 progress meeting today and I just wanted to verify that the intent is for this work to be coordinated through the CDD contract without Tavistock involvement. Brent has put in a budget amendment on his LP Phase 10 project to coverthe developer costs for Nemours 7 but there Is no money In the budget for these laterals. Hopefully the COD can Issue a change order to JDC, process the JDC Invoice, and obtain reimbursement from Nemours Hospital.
Best regards,
TROY E. DAVIDSON, PE
Land Infrastructure Project Manager
<image00 l .jpg>
Tavistock Development Company 6900 Tavistock Lakes Blvd, Suite 200
Orlando, FL 32827
P: (407) 888-6505
C: (407) 461-8823
www.tavistockdevelopment.com

From: Jimi Dugan <Jimi.Dugan@jr-davis.com> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 5:25 PM To: Larry Kaufmann <lkaufmann@tavistock.com>
1

Cc: Josh Huynh <losh.Huynh@jr-davis.com>; Troy Davidson <troy.davidson@tavistock.com>; Conor MacNamara
<Conor.MacNamara@jr-davis.com>
Subject: RE: GID Nemours Parkway Phase 7 - Revision to Construction Drawings #2

l!XTERNAL E-MAIL

Larry,
Please see the attached for the added hospital sanitary and reclaim laterals. Feel free to reach out ifyon have any questions.

Thanks,        Jimi Dugan Project Engineer
<imageoo2.jpg>
Jr. Davis Construction Company, Inc.
210 S. Hoagland Blvd. Kissimmee, FL 34741
Phone: (407) 870-0066
Cell: (321) 624-8603
Thistransmission is intended only for the usa oftheaddresseeshown. It contains informaton thatmaybe privileged,  confidential  and/orexempt from  disclosure under appl cable law.Ifyou are not the Intended recipientof this transmission,you are hereby notified that the copying, use, forwarding, ordistribution ofany information or materials transmitted herewith is strictyprohibited. Ifyou have rece ved thistransmission in error, please destroytheoriginal messageandimmediately contact the sender.

From: Larry Kaufmann [mailto:lkaufmann@tavistock.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 1:55 PM
To: Josh Huynh <Josh.Huynh@jr-davis.com>
Cc: Jimbo Bjorkland <Jimbo.Bjorkland@jr-davis.com>

KOS

Subject: FW: GID Nemours Parkway Phase 7 - Revision to Construction Drawings #2 Josh, did you get this quote for me done?

Kaufmann Development Services, LLC Larry Kaufmann, PE
(407) 448-6592
LKaufmann@tavistock.com

From: Larry Kaufmann
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2018 2:21 PM
To:Josh Huynh <Josh.Huynh@jr-davis.com>
Cc: Jimbo Bjorkland <Jimbo.Bjorkland@jr-davis.com>
Subject: FW: GID Nemours Parkway Phase 7 - Revision to Construction Drawings #2
I do not recall seeing your change order for the services. Please send me a copy, the hospital needs some backup paperwork.

KOS
Kaufmann Development Services, LLC Larry Kaufmann, PE
(407) 448-6592
2

LKaufmann@tavistock.com

From: Larry Kaufmann
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2018 11:46 AM To: Josh Huynh <Josh.Huynh@jr-davis.com>
Cc: 'Sky Fayne' <sky.fayne@jr-davis.com>; Jeffrey Newton (jjnewton@dwma.com) <jjnewton@dwma.com>
Subject: FW: GID Nemours Parkway Phase 7 - Revision to Construction Drawings #2
Josh, I need a quote from JDC for the additional service laterals to the Hospital. Nemours Hospital is paying us for the laterals so it needs to be a separate quote that I can send them. We will add this work to the contract and obtain funding from Nemours.

KDS

Kaufmann Development Services, LLC Larry Kaufmann, PE
(407) 448-6592
LKaufmann@tavistock.com

From: Kirby White, PE <kwhite@dwma.com>
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 10:37 AM
To: Larry Kaufmann <lkaufmann@tavistock.com>
Subject: FW: GID Nemours Parkway Phase 7 - Revision to Construction Drawings #2

EXTERNAL E-MAIL

Added Nemours Hospital sewer and reclaimed water stubs ifyou want to forward to Mike Cluff.
Kirby L. Whi�e. PE Senior Vice President

~	~

DONALD W. MCINTOSH ASSOCIATES, INC.
2200 Park Avenue North ~ Winter Park, Florida 32789-2355	Phone: 407-644-4068	Fax: 407-644-8318 ~ Email: kwhite@dwma.com
•01SCLAIMER OF LIABILITY- The data contained within this e-mall ls the sOfepropertyOf Donald W. McIntosh Associates, Inc. ("DWMA") andis transmitted to you at your requestforyourCQnvenlence. The user ofthis data assumes all liability resulting from such use and hereby releases DWMAfrom liability ofany nature, expressed or implied. relating to the data CQntained thereon. All Information containedon said data Is subject to change et the discretion of DWMA DWMA Is not responsible to the rec pient for CQmpatibility with the reeipent's hardware and/or software. It is imperative thatthe user check th s datafor viruses.

From: Kirby White, PE
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 10:34 AM
To: Josh Huynh <Josh.Huynh@jr davis.com>; Bill Keck <Bill.Keck@jr-davis.com>; Jimi Dugan <Jimi.Dugan@jr-davis.com>; 'jimbo at jr-davis.com' <jimbo@jr-davis.com>; 'lkaufmann@Tavistock.com' <lkaufmann@Tavistock.com>; Brent Schademan <brent.schademan@tavistock.com>; 'scott.thacker@tavistock.com' <scott.thacker@tavistock.com>; 'jtgriffin@dixhite.com' <jtgriffin@dixhite.com>; Lance Jackson <lance.jackson@tavistock.com>; Galloway, Mike
<MGalloway@ouc.com>
Cc: Robin Persad <rpersad@dwma.com>
Subject: GID Nemours Parkway Phase 7 - Revision to Construction Drawings #2

For your use, please find attached the Revision to Construction Drawings (Revision #2) dated September 14, 2018, for the above referenced projec�. Ifyou have any questions, please let us know. Thank you.

Lisa Toney on behalf of Kirby L. White, P.E. Lisa Toney
3

LAKE NONA SOUTH
Greeneway Improvement District Kellogg Avenue Extension Change Order Log
Dewitt Excavating

C.0. #	Date	Description of Revision	AdellllDayons al

Amount	Status

OrlCorcractgnl CoriractAmouDnlate
$1,797,324.158

To Board	Approval Date	Notn

1	7/12/2018    DAcecvesel0spRoor Padorati<lndnI-mSptaortb!Fiziell Construction 	0
"	8/1/2018         Add days to contractduetoweatl'er	8

$230,500.00	Approved	$2,027,82456
$0.00	Ap(lrOVed	$2,027,82458

7/17/2016	7117/2016
8/23/2016	8/2312018

'9114/2018
9/14/2018

OlgUhlCnAgclaces)'(IUIs Roonevisf,g..riona-teiolnec-tKricelalogndgsAtrveeentue 	0

0

Extens on

OligUhtCingAcclae)'rssuRcorniguaevision -tioelectricn•HartweandllstCourtreet
Extension

--$2,1◄6.86	Approved	$2.025,67770

Approved

S65,127 18

$2090,804.88

911812018	9/18/2018

9/18/2016	9/16/2018

0

10115/2018 ChangecfOak Trees toAcer Rubrum

10/16/2018   ATrdeesdtioonnolyfcompostto plart area for Canopy 	0
2/412019	Creel�for dirt not imported	0

and Water park

1/7/2019     WCaateeraSndercovicmeeCcotlonnectnforioSnM0for7S•occSocercerFieFldield; 	0

-$50000	Approved

$2 090.30488

$1,691.88	Approved	$2,091,996.76

-$124,60800	Approved	$1,967,38876

$19,077.25	Approved	$1,900 466.01

10/16/2018	10/16/2018

11/19/2018	11/19/2018

2/19/2019	2/19/2019

2/19/2019	2/19/2019

2/612019    Stop signand lhennopalrt	0
2/19/2019     Changeofstreet sign	0

F:\Forms\Constructlon\Logs\COO LOGS.xis

$1,956.00	Approved	$1,988,422.01

$750.00	Pending	$1,989,172.01

CO Kellogg Gree 	av

2/19/2019	2/19/2019

3119/2019

6/20/20 19 Page 1